As we discussed in class, there are five types of individual instruction techniques that are as follows:
- Sheets
- Experiments
- Supervised Study
- Independent Study
- Student Notebooks
In an agriscience classroom we see all of these techniques being used. Our last lab experience was problem solving approach which can be carried out either as a group or individual teaching technique.
Being involved in Agricultural Education in some capacity means that we should all be familiar with the three circle model! What I find interesting is that when taking a look at all three circles individually, I notice that the different individual techniques can be applied to all three of the circles. While we assume that a Supervised Agricultural Experience (SAE) would be an independent study scenario, it can actually be almost any of the above five techniques. How you ask? Think about this, students work on their SAE independently, sometimes the teacher assists and guides but not always, some students hold a research SAE, and lastly records on any and all SAEs must be kept. If that doesn't explain that it can fit in with all five then I have no idea what will. This is great because every circle can fully utilize differentiated instruction. Remember, if you're fed your favorite food for every meal you will soon get tired of it. Differentiate your instruction and make each lesson fun whether the activities are group or individual. Make it fun, ya'll!
Check out my resource for this week! It's a nice article that talks about the benefit of individualized instruction that fits each student. It somewhat fits activities that take place in an average agriscience classroom. I think that it can be looked at through SAE goggles when thinking that each student has an experience that is unique to them because SAEs are meant to ignite their passions.
http://www.dreambox.com/blog/pros-cons-individualized-instruction
http://www.dreambox.com/blog/pros-cons-individualized-instruction
Let me know what your thoughts are!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References:
Newcomb, L.H., McCracken, J.D., Warmbrod, J.R., & Whittington, M.S. (1993). Methods of teaching agriculture. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
EduGains. (2015). Reach every student through differentiated instruction. Retrieved from http://www.edugains.ca/resourcesDI/Brochures/DIBrochureOct08.pdf
Green, N. (2013). Pros and cons of individualized instruction. DreamBox Learning. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from http://www.dreambox.com/blog/pros-cons-individualized-instruction
Angie, I love that you were able to connect the ITT to the three circle model. I too believe that you can see all techniques used in all three circles, especially SAE. I noticed everyone just thought that SAE would be supervised study but I too believe that all of the techniques are used in SAE. Love the connections made in this reflection!!!!
ReplyDeleteGreat thoughts, Angie! I definitely agree that all of the individualized teaching techniques can be applicable in an SAE. I also think that oftentimes you combine teaching techniques, such as including sheets during an experiment.
ReplyDeleteAngie, I agree with Macy that it was great how you connected to the 3 circle model and SAEs! How do you see ITTs fitting into the FFA circle? Thanks for sharing an informative resource!
ReplyDeleteAngie - I thought it was great how you shared from our class discussion on SAE. Although it is not easily thought of because we often think of 'S' as standing for Supervised, all the techniques presented can be implemented.
ReplyDeleteDo you believe your lab could have been thought through with individualized teaching techniques?
Angie, it was amazing that you were able to connect ITT to the three circle model. Do you see yourself applying this in your classroom?
ReplyDelete